Weapons of Mass Collaboration

Chapter 1 of “Wikinomics – How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything” begins with a case study of the “Goldcorp Challenge”, where a failing mining company publicised 50 years worth of geological data in an internet based competition, offering $575,000 worth of prizes to whoever could offer the best methods and estimates for extraction of gold deposits from the company’s 55,000 acre property.


“Within weeks, submissions from around the world came flooding in to Goldcorp headquarters. As expected, geologists got involved. But entries came from surprising sources, including graduate students, consultants, mathematicians, and military officers, all seeking a piece of the action.”
Needless to say, the story has a happy ending. Share prices increased by 2900% from 1993 to 2006. Goldcorp was transformed from a “100 million company into a $9 billion juggernaut”. Proof, according to the author, that mass collaboration is where it’s at. Or is it?

I always thought that collaboration involved people working together on a problem or project. I don’t see that here, I see a competition model where the solutions are suggested by a field of entrants (individuals working concurrently but independently) and evaluated by Goldcorp. All parties are self-interested. It seems to me that this is a large scale version of competitions such as Wellington Zoo’s name the BolivianSquirrel Monkey competition, or Bluebird’s competition to find a new chip flavour. Yes, these competitions give organisations access to a much greater creative pool, but they are not examples of mass collaboration, nor are they proof of the Internet changing the world.


 So let’s see if we can find some better examples of web-enabled collaborative projects. What about Wikipedia? Or Linux? These are both the result of interested parties putting their own time and expertise into developing products…that pretty much already existed, didn’t they?  My computer came with an operating system, so unless I was pretty far up the geek spectrum why would I want another one? I don’t know about you, but I have never sat and leafed through an encyclopaedia. So why is it necessary to have the conglomeration of knowledge that is already on the web brought together in one site called Wikipedia? I hope I’m kicking a hornet’s nest here. I want to believe that we can harness the Internet to make a better world; I just haven’t seen it yet. What do you think?
Advertisements

Tags: ,

About theporousmembrane

Studying for Bachelor of Information Science (IT) through Massey Univeristy's extramural programme. Raising two small people and two furbabies. Part time teacher.

One response to “Weapons of Mass Collaboration”

  1. theporousmembrane says :

    I’m incredibly irritated with the time it is taking me to get these posts looking passable. The visual editor looks nothing like the preview of the post and flicking backwards and forwards is driving me nuts! On my editing screen there are clear gaps between the paragraphs that disappear when the blog is published. Not happy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: